Benutzer-Werkzeuge

Webseiten-Werkzeuge


begriffe:gen

Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

Link zu dieser Vergleichsansicht

Beide Seiten der vorigen RevisionVorhergehende Überarbeitung
Nächste Überarbeitung
Vorhergehende Überarbeitung
gen [2013/07/03 22:39] – [B. Sekundärmaterial] heynebegriffe:gen [2020/04/19 19:19] (aktuell) – Überschrift geändert sinn
Zeile 1: Zeile 1:
-====== Gen ======+====== Gen / genetisch ======
  
  
Zeile 18: Zeile 18:
 ==== A. Primärmaterial ==== ==== A. Primärmaterial ====
  
 +Zum Artikel im Deutschen Fremdwörterbuch: http://www.owid.de/artikel/406559
 ==== B. Sekundärmaterial ==== ==== B. Sekundärmaterial ====
 === Begriffsgeschichtliche Arbeiten === === Begriffsgeschichtliche Arbeiten ===
Zeile 27: Zeile 28:
 === Sonstige Literatur === === Sonstige Literatur ===
  
-  * Achermann, Eric: Genetik und Genesik. An- und Bemerkungen zu Sigrid Weigels (Hg.) 'Genealogie und Genetik'. In: Scientia Poetica 6, 2002, S. 172–203.  +  * Achermann, Eric: Genetik und Genesik. An- und Bemerkungen zu Sigrid Weigels (Hg.) 'Genealogie und Genetik'. In: Scientia Poetica 6, 2002, S. 172–203
 +   
 +  * Anaya-Muñoz, Víctor Hugo u. García-Deister, Vivette u. Suárez-Díaz, Edna: Flattening and Unpacking Human Genetic Variation in Mexico, Postwar to Present. In: SIC, 30/1 (2017), S. 89-112. 
 +   
 +  * Baetu, Tudor M.: Genes after the human genome project. In: History and Philosophy of Science Part C (2012), S. 191-201.  
  
   * Beurton, Peter; Raphael Falk u. Hans-Jörg Rheinberger: The concept of the gene in development and evolution - Historical and epistemological perspectives. Cambridge, 2000.   * Beurton, Peter; Raphael Falk u. Hans-Jörg Rheinberger: The concept of the gene in development and evolution - Historical and epistemological perspectives. Cambridge, 2000.
Zeile 42: Zeile 47:
  
   * Dunn, Leslie Clarence: A Short History of Genetics. The Development of some of the Main Lines of Thought: 1864–1939. New York, 1965.   * Dunn, Leslie Clarence: A Short History of Genetics. The Development of some of the Main Lines of Thought: 1864–1939. New York, 1965.
 +  
 +  * Ewens, W. J.: What is the Gene Trying to Do? In: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62/1, 2011, S. 155-176. 
  
-  * Falk, Raphael: What is a gene? In: Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A 17/21986, S. 133-173.+  * Falk, Raphael: What is a gene? In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A17/2 (1986), S. 133-173
 +   
 +  * Falk, Raphael: What is a Gene? - Rivisited. In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C, 41/4 (2010), S. 396-406.
  
   * Griffiths, Paul, u. Karola Stotz: Genes in the postgenomic era. In: Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27, 2006, S. 499–521.   * Griffiths, Paul, u. Karola Stotz: Genes in the postgenomic era. In: Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27, 2006, S. 499–521.
Zeile 62: Zeile 71:
  
   * Leeming, William: Ideas about heredity, genetics, and ‘medical genetics’ in Britain, 1900–1982. In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36/3, 2005, S. 538-558. [[redaktion:gen|Abstract]]   * Leeming, William: Ideas about heredity, genetics, and ‘medical genetics’ in Britain, 1900–1982. In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36/3, 2005, S. 538-558. [[redaktion:gen|Abstract]]
 +  
 +  * Leeming, William: Tracing the shifting sands of ‘medical genetics’: what’s in a name? In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C, 41/1 (2010), S. 50-60.
 +
 +  * Lemke, Thomas: ,Gen‘, in: Bröckling etl. al., Glossar der Gegenwart. Frankfurt.
  
   * Löther, Rolf: Wegbereiter der Genetik: Gregor Johann Mendel und August Weismann. Frankfurt a. M., 1990.    * Löther, Rolf: Wegbereiter der Genetik: Gregor Johann Mendel und August Weismann. Frankfurt a. M., 1990. 
Zeile 75: Zeile 88:
   * Moss, Lenny: The meanings of the gene and the future of the phenotype. In: Genetics, Society and Policy 4, 2008, S. 38–57. {{:redaktion:materialien:the_meanings_of_the_gene_and_the_future_of_the_phenotype.doc|Volltext}}   * Moss, Lenny: The meanings of the gene and the future of the phenotype. In: Genetics, Society and Policy 4, 2008, S. 38–57. {{:redaktion:materialien:the_meanings_of_the_gene_and_the_future_of_the_phenotype.doc|Volltext}}
  
-  * Muller, Herman J: The development of the gene theory. In: Genetics in the 20th Century. Essays on the Progress of Genetics During its First 50 Years. Hg. von Leslie C. Dunn. New York, 1951. 77–99.+  * Muller, Herman J: The development of the gene theory. In: Genetics in the 20th Century. Essays on the Progress of Genetics During its First 50 Years. Hg. von Leslie C. Dunn. New York, 1951, S. 77–99.
  
   * Müller-Wille, Staffan u. Rheinberger, Hand-Jörg: Das Gen im Zeitalter der Postgenomik. Eine wissenschaftshistorische Bestandsaufnahme. Edition unseld, Frankfurt a.M., 2009.   * Müller-Wille, Staffan u. Rheinberger, Hand-Jörg: Das Gen im Zeitalter der Postgenomik. Eine wissenschaftshistorische Bestandsaufnahme. Edition unseld, Frankfurt a.M., 2009.
  
-  * Müller-Wille, Staffan: Hybrids, pure cultures, and pure lines: From nineteenth-century biology to twentieth-century genetics. Studies in History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 38 (2007S. 796–806.+  * Müller-Wille, Staffan: Hybrids, pure cultures, and pure lines: From nineteenth-century biology to twentieth-century genetics. In: Studies in History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 382007S. 796–806. [[redaktion:gen|Abstract intern]], [[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18053934|Abstract online]]
  
-|Abstract: Prompted by recent recognitions of the omnipresence of horizontal gene transfer among microbial species and the associated emphasis on exchange, rather than isolation, as the driving force of evolution, this essay will reflect on hybridization as one of the central concerns of nineteenth-century biology. I will argue that an emphasis on horizontal exchange was already endorsed by 'biology' when it came into being around 1800 and was brought to full fruition with the emergence of genetics in 1900. The true revolution in nineteenth-century life sciences, I maintain, consisted in a fundamental shift in ontology, which eroded the boundaries between individual and species, and allowed biologists to move up and down the scale of organic complexity. Life became a property extending both 'downwards', to the parts that organisms were composed of, as well as 'upwards', to the collective entities constituted by the relations of exchange and interaction that organisms engage in to reproduce. This mode of thinking was crystallized by Gregor Mendel and consolidated in the late nineteenth-century conjunction of biochemistry, microbiology and breeding in agro-industrial settings. This conjunction and its implications are especially exemplified by Wilhelm Johannsen's and Martinus Beijerinck's work on pure lines and cultures. An understanding of the subsequent constraints imposed by the evolutionary synthesis of the twentieth century on models of genetic systems may require us to rethink the history of biology and displace Darwin's theory of natural selection from that history's centre.| +  * Müller-Wille, Staffan u. Vitezslav Orel: From Linnaean species to Mendelian factors: Elements of hybridism, 1751-1870. In: Annals of Science 642007S. 171–215. [[redaktion:gen|Abstract intern]], [[http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00033790601111567#.UdSNzPl7L04|Abstract online]]
- +
-  * Müller-Wille, Staffan u. Vitezslav Orel: From Linnaean species to Mendelian factors: Elements of hybridism, 1751-1870. Annals of Science 64 )2007S. 171–215. +
- +
-|Abstract: In 1979, Robert COlby published an article titled 'Mendel no Mendelian?', in which he questioned commonly held views that Gregor Mendel (1822-1884) laid the foundations for modern geneticsAccording to Olby, and other historians of science who have since followed him, Mendel worked within the tradition of so-called hybridists, who were interested in the evolutionary role of hybrids rather than in laws of inheritanceWe propose instead to view the hybridist tradition as an experimental programme characterized by a dynamic development that inadvertently led to a focus on the inheritance of individual traits. Through a careful analysis of publications on hybridization by Carl Linnaeus (1707-1778), Joseph Gottlieb Koelreuter (1733-1806), Carl Friedrich Gärtner (1772-1850), and finally Mendel himself, we will show that this development consisted in repeated reclassifications of hybrids to accommodate anomalies, which in the end allowed Mendel to draw analogies between whole organisms, individual traits, and 'elements' contained in reproductive cells. Mendel's achievement was a product of normal science, and yet a revolutionary step forward. This also explains why, in 1900, when the report he gave on his experiments was 'rediscovered', Mendel could be read as a 'Mendelian'.|+
  
   * Neumann-Held, Eva M. u.Christoph Rehmann-Sutter (Hg.): Genes in Development: Re-Reading the Molecular Paradigm. Durham, 2006.   * Neumann-Held, Eva M. u.Christoph Rehmann-Sutter (Hg.): Genes in Development: Re-Reading the Molecular Paradigm. Durham, 2006.
 +  
 +  * O’Malleya, Maureen; Elliottb, Kevin C.; Burian, Richard M.: From genetic to genomic regulation: iterativity in microRNA research. In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C, 41/4 (2010), S. 407–417. 
  
-  * Portin, Petter: The concept of the gene: Short history and present status. The Quarterly Review of Biology 68 (1993S. 173–223. +  * Portin, Petter: The concept of the gene: Short history and present status. In: The Quarterly Review of Biology 681993S. 173–223. [[redaktion:gen|Abstract intern]], [[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7688132|Abstract intern]] 
- +   
-|Abstract: The concept of the gene is and has always been a continuously evolving oneIn order to provide a structure for understanding the concept, its history is divided into classical, neoclassical, and modern periodsThe classical view prevailed into the 1930s, and conceived the gene as an indivisible unit of genetic transmission, recombination, mutationand functionThe discovery of intragenic recombination in the early 1940s and the establishment of DNA as the physical basis of inheritance led to the neoclassical concept of the gene, which prevailed until the 1970s. In this view the gene (or cistron, as it was called then) was subdivided into its constituent parts, mutons and recons, identified as nucleotides. Each cistron was believed to be responsible for the synthesis of a single mRNA and hence for one polypeptide. This colinearity hypothesis prevailed from 1955 to the 1970s. Starting from the early 1970sDNA technologies have led to the modern period of gene conceptualizationwherein none of the classical or neoclassical criteria are sufficient to define a gene. Modern discoveries include those of repeated genessplit genes and alternative splicing, assembled genes, overlapping genes, transposable genes, complex promoters, multiple polyadenylation sites, polyprotein genes, editing of the primary transcript, and nested genesWe are currently left with a rather abstract, open, and generalized concept of the gene, even though our comprehension of the structure and organization of the genetic material has greatly increased.|+  * ReydonThomas AC.: Gene Names as Proper Names of Individuals: An Assessment. In: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science60/22009S409-432. 
 + 
  
   * Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg und Staffan Müller-Wille: (Art.) [[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/gene/|Gene]], in: Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, 2004.   * Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg und Staffan Müller-Wille: (Art.) [[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/gene/|Gene]], in: Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, 2004.
  
-  * Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg: Gene concepts. Fragments from the perspective of molecular biology. In: The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution. Historical and Epistemological Perspectives. Hg. von Peter Beurton, Raphael Falk, u. Hans-Jörg Rheinberger. Cambridge, 2000S. 219-239.+  * Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg: Gene concepts. Fragments from the perspective of molecular biology. In: The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution. Historical and Epistemological Perspectives. Hg. von Peter Beurton, Raphael Falk, u. Hans-Jörg Rheinberger. Cambridge, 2000S. 219-239.
  
-  * Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg: Die Evolution des Genbegriffs. Fragmente aus der Perspektive der Molekularbiologie. In: Die Entstehung der synthetischen Theorie. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Evolutionsbiologie in Deutschland 1930-1950. Hg. von Thomas Junker u. Eve-Marie Engels. Berlin, 1999S. 323-341. (Verhandlungen zur Geschichte und Theorie der Biologie 2)+  * Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg: Die Evolution des Genbegriffs. Fragmente aus der Perspektive der Molekularbiologie. In: Die Entstehung der synthetischen Theorie. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Evolutionsbiologie in Deutschland 1930-1950. Hg. von Thomas Junker u. Eve-Marie Engels. Berlin, 1999S. 323-341. (Verhandlungen zur Geschichte und Theorie der Biologie 2.)
  
   * Rushton, Alan R.: Genetics and Medicine in the United States 1800 to 1922. Baltimore, 1994.   * Rushton, Alan R.: Genetics and Medicine in the United States 1800 to 1922. Baltimore, 1994.
Zeile 103: Zeile 115:
   * Schwarke, Christian: Die Kultur der Gene. Eine theologische Hermeneutik der Gentechnik. Stuttgart, 2000.     * Schwarke, Christian: Die Kultur der Gene. Eine theologische Hermeneutik der Gentechnik. Stuttgart, 2000.  
  
-  * Schwartz, Sara: The differential concept of the gene: Past and present. In: The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution. Historical and Epistemological Perspectives. Hg. von Peter Beurton, Raphael Falk, u. Hans-Jörg Rheinberger. Cambridge, 2000S. 26–39.+  * Schwartz, Sara: The differential concept of the gene: Past and present. In: The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution. Historical and Epistemological Perspectives. Hg. von Peter Beurton, Raphael Falk, u. Hans-Jörg Rheinberger. Cambridge, 2000S. 26–39.
  
-  * Stotz, Karola, Paul E. Griffiths u. Rob Knight: How biologists conceptualize genes: an empirical study. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 35 (2004S. 647–673. {{:redaktion:materialien:hpbbs.pdf|Volltext}}+  * Stotz, Karola, Paul E. Griffiths u. Rob Knight: How biologists conceptualize genes: an empirical study. In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 352004S. 647–673. {{:redaktion:materialien:hpbbs.pdf|Volltext}} 
 +   
 +  * Velasco, J. D.: Species, Genes, and the Tree of Life. In: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61/3, 2010, S. 599-620. 
  
-  * Weigel, Sigrid(Hg.): Genealogie und Genetik. Berlin, 2000. (Einstein Bücher)+  * Weigel, Sigrid (Hg.): Genealogie und Genetik. Berlin, 2000. (Einstein Bücher)
  
   * Working Group: Gene Concepts in Development and Evolution. Berlin, 1999. (=Preprint 123)   * Working Group: Gene Concepts in Development and Evolution. Berlin, 1999. (=Preprint 123)
Zeile 114: Zeile 128:
 [[redaktion:gen|Redaktionsseite]] [[redaktion:gen|Redaktionsseite]]
  
-^ Kategorien: {{tag>Biologie Genetik Molekularbiologie}}^ +^ Kategorien: {{tag>Biologie Genetik Molekularbiologie gg}}^ 
begriffe/gen.1372883980.txt.gz · Zuletzt geändert: 2015/12/15 14:30 (Externe Bearbeitung)